data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893e4/893e4ae6aff398ec6932f0a7f97e7155276176f3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31522/31522cb94a0edaaf3b3938c1f76ac7a753f5194f" alt=""
So, people have done this (Lee and Wilson), and recorded where the animal goes and which cells fire. And then they record the activity of these cells while the animal is sleeping (during slow wave sleep i.e. deep sleep, with no dreaming).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce2c7/ce2c7348432a3c3b5dd418b215dce9c9c90efee0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c01e7/c01e7021398719cc06ff1ce8a6f03d6fca396f2c" alt=""
There is one key difference between the activity of the place cells during the awake-behaving period to the activity during the sharp waves during sleep that should be mentioned. During awake navigation, the cells fire in order dictated by their place field in the time it takes him to move from one field to another - in this case the whole navigation of the 'maze' took about 4-5 seconds, so recording the whole sequence of place cell firing takes 5 seconds. But during sleep, during the sharp wave, they all fire in the same order, but it takes less than 200 milliseconds from the first to the last. So playback of this information was about 20X faster than recording - on average.
Interestingly, this speeding up of playback might just make it easier to understand how it gets stored in cortex, because neurons do everything fast. Action potentials, and biochemical pathways, everything takes milliseconds to reach completion. If an animal is going to learn that there is a relationship between two events (i.e. bar press = food reward), it's difficult because these things happen at a very slow timescale. And if it takes 200 milliseconds for the whole chain of events to be played back, it's a more reasonable task. And it ties the reasearch into a huge body of literature by people who study learning and memory at the single cell level - who find that co-activation of two cells within a time of 20 ms or so will lead to a strengthening of the connection between them.
So, basically, the idea is that, the hippocampus records a slow sequence of events and plays it back real fast, and the sequential firing of cells, drives cells in cortex to fire at the same time, and thereby strengthening the connections between the cortical cells. Thereby consolidating those memories there for long term storage.
Of course, saying that the hippocampus guides the long term storage of information in cerebral cortex begs the question: How does it get recorded in the hippocampus in the first place? But that's a whole different thing.
There's more to the story, that I'll get to tomorrow. There's some new data that came out last month that might throw a wrench in this model, or maybe not, it's unclear, it's cutting edge, you'll hear it here first.
Rock on.
Keith.
6 comments:
hi..Im Fie.., would like to ask you how to upload the live picture as you show it on your page. Could you tell me how, plz.. thanks.
electrodes in burritos coming soon.
Hi Sofie,
I think you mean that picture to the left, and it's just a regular picture. There's a picture that's too big to fit, so there's some cropping and some javascript that moves the cropping every so often.
Feel free to copy it from my template.
Keith.
Thanks for the heads up rumour.
Keith.
Would be interesting to know if this is related to Alzheimer's research...
When you add stress, does it make a difference in the cell activity? I've noticed in times of stress, I am more forgetful
ok this is JUST too weird...i was doing research for my cultural anthropology class, and I ran across almost the exact information in an article on the future of technology...weird. weird. weird.
interesting stuff there keith!
Post a Comment